Sharks of the Corn (2021) movie review

Wiki Article



Are you ready for the thrill of a shark-infested ride through fields of corn? Take a seat because "Sharks of the Corn" promises the ultimate in horror and comedy. Directed by the famous Tim Ritter, this ultra low-budget film takes inspiration from Stephen King's masterpiece "Children of the Corn" (1984) and turns it into a hilarious and bizarre comedy that'll leave you both scratching your head while rolling around smiling.

One of the most exciting Cornfield Carnival of Chaos


From the beginning of an unassuming cornfield "Sharks of the Corn" is able to establish its uniqueness. The film introduces Gary and Susan and Susan, two people who quickly fade into the background with the film taking off in unexpected direction. The plot weaves together gore elements along with numerous subplots, creating a delightful blend that can be called a cornfield carnival filled with chaos.



An Adept of the Psychopathic Shark


There's Teddy Bo Lucas, a persona that provides an additional degree of chaos to an existing story that is incredibly confusing. The psychotic shark enthusiast is an obsession that is unnatural with water-based predators. As if sharks in the cornfields weren't enough weird, Teddy has taken his fascination to another level when He commits an eerie murder in the motel room. This unexpected twist sets the stage to a frenzy of intrigue and mystery.

Confused, Cults along with Sharks


The plot gets more complex as authorities put the blame on the poor Gary who was responsible for the death of Susan even though there is no motive. In the meantime, a shark cult develops into a unique part of the story, leading us into the world of cornfields where the cult of sharks collide. As if that it's impossible to imagine anything more outrageous and more twisted, two creepy burglars attempt that they will steal a puppy shark from this group of people. The film is a tangled mix of horror and comedy that keeps an audience engaged.

Critiques as well as Comic Relief


While "Sharks of the Corn" has a refreshing and distinctive entertainment, it's certainly not without its flaws. It often jumps between the various scenes and characters, that can cause viewers to be confused or unable to grasp its multiple plots. It's a deliberate stylistic choice which adds to the humorous nature of the film, but it's not every person's cup of tea.

The production standards of the film are deliberately low and the acting is in the realm of questionable. The film is nevertheless amidst a sea of subpar performances Steve Guynn shines through with his commendable portrayal, actually performing his character and not merely reciting sentences. It's a rare gem of real acting in the midst in which the actors are exaggerated.

Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines


"Sharks of the Corn" showcases its low-budget appeal with poor effects that are able to create been able to create a certain appeal. It is notable that the majority of shark attack scenes are hilariously presented by hand puppets. It adds some humour to the film. A crazy plotline, centering about a shark-cult's attempt to revive a python goddess, is where the movie is truly able to unleash its creative. Unfortunately, that creativity usually results in a less interesting viewer experience.

Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional


(click blog) The one area in which "Sharks of the Corn" fails is the cinematography. The visuals and framing come looking amateurish. They lack polished and refined look that's often seen in popular horror films. While it's possible that this was done to retain the budget-conscious aesthetic however, it has a negative impact on the general quality of the watching experience.

In the end "Sharks of the Corn" is a cult favorite. The film is slow and boring mixture of stories that can be confusing of. The low production quality unclear plots, confusing storylines, and unreliable acting could turn off people looking for a more professional horror-comedy. If you're looking for poor films for entertainment "Sharks of the Corn" does not deliver (blog) the expected humour.

Final Rating The Final Score: One "Stock Footage Overlay" Out Five


The video isn't of high-quality, and the actor, sound and editing "Sharks of the Corn" can't quite reach the benchmark. Even though it's a humorous spoof movie, the movie fails to give an engaging and cohesive experience. In my capacity as a reviewer, I end with a funny observation: movies, similar to corn, will only become better when they have explosions. Unfortunately, "Sharks of the Corn" fails to make the cut.

Report this wiki page